Peer Review Process

International Journal on Commerce, Management, Tourism and Home Science is an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal that follows a rigorous peer review mechanism to ensure academic quality, originality, and ethical integrity. The journal is declared as a Peer-Reviewed Journal through the constitution of a Peer Review Committee comprising eminent scholars and academicians. The objective of this process is to enhance research quality and effectively prevent plagiarism by evaluating manuscripts prior to publication.

The journal follows a double-blind peer review system. Peer review is one of the most important quality control measures for any academic journal. This process involves a critical and objective evaluation of scholarly work from multiple perspectives, including writing quality, technical content, documentation, methodological soundness, and relevance to the discipline by subject experts in the relevant fields.

Initially, each manuscript is examined by the Editorial Office, including a plagiarism screening. Manuscripts found suitable after preliminary screening are forwarded to at least two independent subject experts for peer review. If revisions are required, the manuscript is returned to the author for necessary corrections. Authors are informed about acceptance or rejection through email, generally within 7–15 working days of submission. Accepted manuscripts are scheduled for publication after completion of all required formalities.

Guidelines for Peer Review Process

International Journal on Commerce, Management, Tourism and Home Science is a reputed peer-reviewed, refereed, and multidisciplinary research journal committed to promoting high-quality research and maintaining academic integrity. The journal follows a rigorous and transparent review process in compliance with established ethical guidelines to ensure the credibility and reliability of published research.

This transparent review policy provides clear guidance for authors, reviewers, and editors, ensuring fairness, objectivity, and a standardized evaluation process for all submitted manuscripts.

Purpose of the Review Process
  • To ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of research papers.
  • To provide constructive and objective feedback to authors for improving their work.
  • To uphold academic standards and ethical publishing practices.
Initial Editorial Screening

Before peer review, submissions face an initial check for fit with the journal's scope and standards. This covers:

  • Relevance Check: Alignment with the journal's goals and focus.
  • Plagiarism Screening: Scan via trusted detection software.
  • Quality of Research: Review of innovation, freshness, and scholarly worth.
  • Language and Formatting: Evaluation of readability, flow, and guideline compliance.

Papers falling short at this stage may be returned for corrections or desk-rejected.

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

The journal follows a double-blind review system, ensuring:

  • Author identities remain hidden from reviewers.
  • Reviewer identities remain hidden from authors.

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent specialists based on:

  • Originality and Novelty: Fresh insights and contributions to the field.
  • Methodological Rigor: Strength of research design, methods, and analysis.
  • Accuracy and Validity of Results: Reliability of findings, interpretations, and conclusions.
  • Relevance of References: Appropriateness and completeness of cited sources.
  • Language and Presentation: Clear, logical, and professional writing style.

Reviewers provide detailed reports to assist the editorial decision-making process.

Reviewer Comments and Revision Process

Authors receive anonymized reviewer feedback and suggested revisions.

  • Revised manuscripts must be resubmitted within the specified deadline.
  • Revised versions may be sent back to reviewers for further evaluation if required.

This process ensures that all published articles meet high academic and ethical standards.

Final Decision by Editorial Board

The Editorial Board makes the final decision based on:

  • Reviewers’ Recommendations: Detailed expert evaluations.
  • Editorial Assessment: Overall scholarly value and potential impact.
  • Compliance with Journal Guidelines: Adherence to all submission requirements.

Possible decisions include:

  • Accepted: Manuscript fully meets quality and ethical standards.
  • Accepted with Minor/Major Revisions: Requires specific improvements.
  • Rejected: Does not meet the journal’s standards.
Transparency and Ethical Standards

The International Journal on Commerce, Management, Tourism and Home Science strictly follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines to promote transparency, fairness, and accountability.

  • Plagiarism and Originality Check: All manuscripts are screened using recognized plagiarism detection tools. Manuscripts exceeding acceptable similarity limits may be rejected or returned for revision.
  • Conflict of Interest Policy: Editors and reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts before evaluation. Biased reviews are strictly prohibited.
  • Reviewers and Editorial Board Accountability: Decisions are based solely on scholarly merit. Confidentiality and fairness are mandatory throughout the review process.